The normalization constant arises from the relationship between the wave function and probability. The complex square of the wave function is the position-space probability density. If we integrate the probability density over all space, then the result should be 1 because the particle must be found to have some value of position.
\(1 = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f^*(x)f(x)dx = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |N|^2 e^{-x^2/{\sigma}^2} dx\)
We can use the substitution \(u = x/{\sigma}\) to simplify the integral into the form of the given identiy.
\(1 = |N|^2 {\sigma} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-u^2} du = |N|^2 {\sigma}\sqrt{\pi}\)
\(N = \left(\frac{1}{{\sigma}^2\pi}\right)^{1/4}\)
Where we have chosen the normalization constant to be wholly real and positive.
\(\tilde{f}(k) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)e^{-ikx}dx\)
\(\tilde{f}(k) = \frac{N}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-x^2/2{\sigma}^2} e^{-ikx}dx = \frac{N}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-x^2/2{\sigma}^2 - ikx}dx\)
We can use the substitution \(u = x/\sqrt{2}{\sigma}\) to simplify the integral.
\(\tilde{f}(k) = \frac{N{\sigma}}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-u^2 - ik\sqrt{2}{\sigma}u}du\)
Here we must “complete the square” in order to make a perfect square in the exponent.
\(\tilde{f}(k) = \frac{N{\sigma}}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-u^2 - ik\sqrt{2}{\sigma}u - (ik{\sigma}/\sqrt{2})^2 + (ik{\sigma}/\sqrt{2})^2}du\)
\(\tilde{f}(k) = \frac{N{\sigma}}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-(u - ik{\sigma}/\sqrt{2})^2 + (ik{\sigma}/\sqrt{2})^2}du\)
\(\tilde{f}(k) = \frac{N{\sigma}}{\sqrt{\pi}}e^{(ik{\sigma}/\sqrt{2})^2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-(u - ik{\sigma}/\sqrt{2})^2}du\)
The substitution \(v = u - ik{\sigma}/\sqrt{2}\) further simplifies the integral to our familiar identity.
\(\tilde{f}(k) = \frac{N{\sigma}}{\sqrt{\pi}}e^{-k^2{\sigma}^2/2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-v^2}dv = \left(\frac{{\sigma}^2}{\pi}\right)^{1/4}e^{-k^2{\sigma}^2/2}\)
How interesting! The Fourier transform of the Gaussian wave function is in fact another Gaussian function, only this time with the variable \(k\) instead of the variable \(x\). Notice that the \({\sigma}\) has moved from the denominator of the exponent to the numerator. Increasing \({\sigma}\) therefore has opposite impacts on the shapes of the two functions---an increase in \({\sigma}\) makes \(f(x)\) wider, but it makes \(\tilde{f}(k)\) narrower.
\(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\tilde{f}^*(k)\tilde{f}(k)dk = \frac{{\sigma}}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-{\sigma}^2k^2} dk\)
We can use the substitution \(u = {\sigma}k\) to simplify the integral into the form of the given identiy.
\(1 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-u^2} du = 1\)
Indeed, the Fourier transform is still normalized. In this case, we are integrating overall all values of \(k\) instead of all values of \(x\). Recall that \(k = p/\hbar\) can be interpreted as momentum in quantum mechanics, so this is equivalent to saying that the probability of finding the particle with some value of momentum between \(\infty\) and \(\infty\) is equal to 1, as it should be.
I will use the exponential representation of the delta function, i.e. \[ \delta(x-x_0)=\frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{ik(x-x_0)}\, dk \] but I will switch the variables \(x\) and \(k\). Note: Watch your signs carefully. Remember that the delta function is even and/or you may need to use the substitution \(y=-x\), \(dy=-dx\), \(x=\infty\Rightarrow y=-\infty\).
Let \(f(x)=\cos kx\). Then, the Fourier Transform is given by: \begin{align*} \tilde{f}(k^{\prime}) &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \cos kx\, e^{-ik^{\prime}x}\, dx\\ &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2} \left(e^{i kx}+e^{-i kx}\right)\, e^{-ik^{\prime}x}\, dx\\ &= \frac{1}{2} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \left(e^{i (k-k^{\prime})x}+e^{-i (k+k^{\prime})x}\right)\, dx\\ &= \pi\, \left(\delta(k-k^{\prime})+\delta(k+k^{\prime})\right) \end{align*} \begin{align*} \tilde{g}(k^{\prime}) &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \sin kx\, e^{-ik^{\prime}x}\, dx\\ &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2i} \left(e^{i kx}-e^{-i kx}\right)\, e^{-ik^{\prime}x}\, dx\\ &= \frac{1}{2i} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \left(e^{i (k-k^{\prime})x}-e^{-i (k+k^{\prime})x}\right)\, dx\\ &= -i\pi\, \left(\delta(k-k^{\prime})-\delta(k+k^{\prime})\right) \end{align*} Important: You cannot use the same label in the exponential in the Fourier Transform, i.e. the \(k^{\prime}\) in \(\exp(-ik^{\prime}x)\) as in the parameter in the function, i.e. the \(k\) in \(f(x)=\cos kx\). Notice how the notation for the Fourier transform \(\tilde{f}(k^{\prime})\) helps you keep track of what you have done.
I can write \(\sin kx\) as a derivative of \(\cos (x)\)
\[\sin kx =-\frac{1}{k}\, \frac{d}{dx}\cos kx\]
It follows that \begin{align*} \cal{F}(\sin kx) &= \cal{F}\Big(-\frac{1}{k}\, \frac{d}{dx}\cos kx \Big) \\ &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}-\frac{1}{k}\, \frac{d}{dx} \cos kx\, e^{-ik^{\prime}x}\, dx \\ &= -\frac{1}{k} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{d}{dx} \cos kx\, e^{-ik^{\prime}x}\, dx\\ &= -\frac{1}{k} \cal{F}\Big(\frac{d}{dx} \cos kx \Big) \end{align*}
According to the Fourier transform derivative formula:
\[F\Big(\tfrac{d}{dx} f(x) \Big) = ik' \tilde{f}(k')\]
Applying this property and plugging in the result from the previous part: \begin{align*} \cal{F}(\sin kx) &= -\frac{1}{k} (ik') \tilde{f}(k') \\ &=-\frac{1}{k} (ik') \pi\, \left[\delta(k-k^{\prime})+\delta(k+k^{\prime})\right] \\ &= - (i \pi)\, \frac{k'}{k}\Big[\delta(k-k^{\prime})+\delta(k+k^{\prime})\Big] \end{align*}
Notice in the second delta function that \(k\) and \(k'\) have equal magnitude but OPPOSITE signs at the peak of the delta function (i.e., the peak is happening at \(k=-k'\)). \begin{align*} \cal{F}(\sin kx) &= - (i \pi)\, \Big[\frac{k'}{k}\delta(k-k^{\prime})+\frac{k'}{k}\delta(k+k^{\prime})\Big] \\ &= - (i \pi)\, \Big[(+1)\delta(k-k^{\prime})+(-1)\delta(k+k^{\prime})\Big] \\ &= - (i \pi)\, \Big[\delta(k-k^{\prime})-\delta(k+k^{\prime})\Big] \\ \end{align*}
This changes the sign of the second term, turning the Fourier transform of the cosine (an even function) into the Fourier transform of the sine (an odd function).
The Fourier transform \(\tilde{f}(k^{\prime})\) tells me which wave numbers \(k^{\prime}\) correspond to plane waves \(e^{ik^{\prime}x}\) that are present in the function \(f(x)=\cos kx\). From Euler's formula, I know that \(\cos kx\) is a linear combination of exponentials (i.e. plane waves) with only \(k\) and \(-k\) present. That is why the Fourier transform has delta functions at \(k\) and \(-k\). The Fourier transform of any (finite) linear combination of sines and cosines will always be delta functions.
Consider a quantum mechanical wave packet shaped like a triangle:
\[ f(x)= \begin{cases} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2\epsilon^3}}\, (x+\epsilon), & -\epsilon<x<0\\ -\sqrt{\frac{3}{2\epsilon^3}}\, (x-\epsilon), & 0<x<\epsilon\\ 0, &\textrm{otherwise} \end{cases} \]
I used Mathematica to do the calculations in the solutions to all of the parts of this problem. The figures show my code and output.
![]()
Look at the correlated colors in the graph. As the function f gets taller and narrower (green->orange->blue), the Fourier transform F gets shorter and wider.