Consider the vector field \(\vec F=(x+2)\hat{x} +(z+2)\hat{z}\).
A current \(I\) flows down a cylindrical wire of radius \(R\).
For an infinitesimally thin cylindrical shell of radius \(b\) with uniform surface charge density \(\sigma\), the electric field is zero for \(s<b\) and \(\vec{E}= \frac{\sigma b}{\epsilon_0 s}\, \hat s\) for \(s > b\). Use the differential form of Gauss' Law to find the charge density everywhere in space.
Consider a point a distance \(z\) above the center of an infinitesimally thin, square sheet of current. The current is parallel to one of the square sides. (Since the current cannot just begin and end in the middle of nowhere, this current is just the building block for some larger current.)
Use the Biot-Savart Law to find the magnetic field at the point \(z\). You may use any symmetry arguments you like, but do not use Ampere's Law.
Note: if you choose to use Mathematica or Maple to evaluate the integral, it may take you into complex number land, even though the integral is clearly real. To address this issue, you should be explicit about what assumptions you want the program to make (“Assume” in Maple and “Assumptions” in Mathematica)
Discuss your answer in the light of the magnetic field above an infinite sheet of current as found using Ampere's Law.
The magnetic field above infinite sheet of current found using Ampere's Law is the same as part b: \begin{equation} \vec B(0,0,z)=-\frac{\mu_0 K_0}{ 2}\, \hat{y} \end{equation}
Using Ampere's Law is, of course, significantly easier, but it cannot be used in part a.